Understand the change
See which modules may be affected and which decisions or business rules constrain the change. Take the supporting records and unanswered questions into review.
Plan a changeEngineering memory for complex software
The end of guessing how your product works.
Muninark connects your repositories with the tickets, decisions and deployment history that explain them. Answers cite their sources and say what is missing, for your engineers and for the AI tools they work with.
Source-linkedHistory-awareYour environment
Why does invoice rounding differ between v4 and v6?
CITED EXAMPLEv4 retained a rounding exception for existing contract terms. The release record says it was removed in v6.0 after migration completed.
commita41f2c9 · 2019-03-14rounding fallback addeddecisionADR-042 · 2019-02-28retain until migrationreleasev6.0 · 2023-05-11fallback removed
Open the answer and its sourcesWhy was the export limit set to 500?
INSUFFICIENTThe available record does not explain the original decision. The gap stays visible.
ILLUSTRATIVE ANSWERS · SYNTHETIC DATA
Built around the work
Find the history you need for the next decision.
For long-lived products with many repositories, parallel releases and context held by a handful of people.
Recover the reasoning
Find the ticket, decision or commit that explains an unusual behavior. Give new engineers a way to check the explanation themselves.
Recover the historical whySupport the right release
Check how behavior changed between releases and which records apply to the customer. Identify the deployment details you still need.
Explore version contextBeyond a single repository
A decision can affect more than one repository.
An invoice calculation may depend on an old contract exception. You may need a decision record and the history of another service to understand it.
Muninark connects those records in a shared knowledge graph. It keeps source references and changes over time, so you can check an answer against the history and identify missing evidence.
See how the platform worksONE PRODUCT · CONNECTED RECORDS
DECISIONKeep the rounding exception
REPOSITORY ACalculation service
REPOSITORY BReporting service
RELEASE RECORDA different rule from v6.0
Illustrative relationships on synthetic data.
The substrate
Store what you already keep. Connect all of it.
A multi-stage ingestion pipeline turns the record your organization already keeps into one governed, temporal knowledge graph. People and AI agents read the same graph under the same access rules.
01 · Sources
commitswork itemsdecisionsdocumentswikisrecordingsdeploy config
02 · One graphTemporal knowledge graph
03 · Readers
Your people
Your AI agents
For people and their AI tools
Use Muninark from your existing tools.
Start with the tools your team already uses. Each answer gives an assistant cited facts to work from where it would otherwise guess. Add repeatable workflows as the need grows.
Ask through MCP
Bring evidence into a compatible assistant or coding tool. The deployment controls which sources and operations are available.
Use a focused skill
Follow a defined procedure for an investigation, change review or onboarding task, with explicit inputs and limits.
Add a supervised process
Coordinate larger tasks with named roles and review steps. The process layer is optional.
Context engineering with verified factsConnections and workflow packages
Who it is for
Most of what a product knows about itself sits in the record of how it came to be.
The current source holds only part of it. These are the people who need the rest.
Teams inheriting a legacy system
The code still runs, but the reasons behind it left with the people who wrote it. Muninark recovers what those people did write down, with dates and sources, and marks where the record runs out.
Investors and acquirers in due diligence
The code together with the history of how it came to be is worth more than the latest version alone. Muninark turns that history into evidence an outside party can query.
Vendors whose customers run different versions
Your v4 customer and your v6 customer ask the same question and need different answers. Muninark keeps history with its dates, so support can check what the record says for each release. Which release questions are supported is agreed during integration.
Engineering teams in regulated industries
An auditor asks why a behavior exists and who decided it. Muninark answers with the decisions, tickets and commits on record; where the trail is incomplete, the answer says what is missing, or that the evidence is insufficient.
Teams refactoring or rewriting old code
A rewrite fails on the behaviors nobody knew were load-bearing. Muninark shows which quirks have a recorded decision behind them and which records a change touches. What has no record stays visibly unknown.
Organizations losing context to turnover
Every departure takes context. Muninark keeps the answers with their sources, so new engineers can ask the graph before they ask a senior colleague.
Security & deployment
Choose where your data and models run.
Run Muninark in your environment. Decide who can access the sources and which model services can receive data.
- Access follows policy.
Configure identities, source scopes and permitted operations. - Evidence remains inspectable.
Retain source references and an audit record of served requests. - Model routing is a decision.
Agree which services receive data, where they run and who operates them.
A focused evaluation
Evaluate it on work your team already does.
Choose a recurring engineering task and the sources it depends on. Ask your experts to assess the answers against the way they work today.
01
Choose the problem
02
Connect the record
03
Evaluate the answers
04
Decide with evidence
Which part of your product takes too long to explain?
Tell us about a recurring question and the sources your team uses. We can help define a pilot around it.