Volume is the wrong fix
Pasting whole documents and old tickets into the window buries the one fact that matters and spends the budget on text nobody checked.
An agent works from what is in its context window. Muninark fills that window with facts from your own record, each traceable to a dated source, so the agent has something to cite when it would otherwise guess.
A coding agent sees the files in front of it. It does not see why a rule exists or which decision constrains it. Where the context holds no fact, the model writes something that sounds right.
Pasting whole documents and old tickets into the window buries the one fact that matters and spends the budget on text nobody checked.
A summary with no reference gives the agent, and the reviewer after it, nothing to verify.
A rule that held two releases ago still reads as true. Without dates and revisions, the agent cannot tell.
Through MCP, an agent asks a question and gets a structured answer it can quote from.
The agent pulls evidence for the question in front of it, so the window holds what the current task needs. Which tools are enabled depends on the deployment.
Search and focused tools, such as decision trails, impact analysis and ticket context, return ranked evidence with citations.
An evidence pack gathers the cited facts on one topic for a code review or a handoff.
A skill records the inputs, tool sequence, checks and stop conditions of a recurring task, so the agent follows the same steps each time.
What an agent receives is revised when its source changes and passes through the same review as everything else in the graph.
How knowledge stays currentTell us about a question it gets wrong, and we can look at what your record could have told it.