Choose one meaningful problem
Select a recurring task and the people who judge its outcome. Record how the work is done today.
An agreed question set and a baseline.
Choose a task your team knows well. Agree which sources to use and how to judge the answers before the pilot starts.
Select a recurring task and the people who judge its outcome. Record how the work is done today.
An agreed question set and a baseline.
Choose the source history, identities, model services and infrastructure. Confirm what stays outside the pilot.
A scoped integration and data-flow plan.
Validate ingestion and access. Evaluate answers on representative questions, including difficult cases and missing evidence.
Reviewed answers, gaps, operating effort and measured costs.
Compare the results with the agreed baseline. Identify remaining integration work and requirements for ongoing use.
An evidence-based decision about expansion.
Compare results with the original question set and baseline. Include difficult cases, plus questions that were held back from tuning.
Source support, significant omissions, incorrect claims, appropriate refusals and correct historical scope.
Time and quality of completing the work, including the reviewer effort needed to use the result responsibly.
Initial import, ongoing updates, model usage, infrastructure and the time spent by operators and experts. The operator console reports token use and estimated cost per model, including the calls made while answering questions.
Saved time is capacity. It becomes a financial saving only where the organization can realize it. Pilot results should keep those measures separate.
A product owner, an engineer who knows the source systems and a security contact are a useful starting group.
The schedule depends on source access, corpus size, history quality and security review. We establish a timeline after scoping, rather than promise a fixed period before seeing the work.
No. Existing code history, tickets and documents can be useful even when incomplete. Missing rationale must remain an explicit gap, and the evaluation should establish which questions the available record can support.
Your experts help select meaningful questions and assess the answers. We include their effort in the pilot plan and in the cost of operating the system.
The proposed engagement separates platform licensing, integration, support, infrastructure and model usage. Scope and operating requirements determine the quote. There is no public price schedule yet.
The core platform serves knowledge and analysis. Optional agent processes can help coordinate work in a host environment; permissions, human reviews and any write actions must be explicitly configured.
Send a short description of the task and the systems that hold the relevant records.