Engineering memory for complex software.
A concise overview to share with your engineering, architecture and security teams.
The problem
In a product with years of history, the reason for a behavior may be in an old ticket or known only to an experienced engineer. A change that spans modules or releases may require checking several of those sources before the team knows what to review.
The product
Muninark ingests selected records, connects them in a temporal knowledge graph and exposes evidence and analysis through MCP. Responses can include citations, confidence bands, coverage limitations and reevaluation information.
First use cases
- Prepare a change review with recorded dependencies and decisions.
- Recover the documented rationale behind a behavior.
- Investigate differences across release and deployment records.
Deployment
You can install the software in your environment. During integration, the team configures source access, identity and model routing, and agrees how to handle data and operate the system. Skills and supervised processes are optional.
How to evaluate it
Choose a set of sources and questions that reflect the work your team does. Compare answer quality, task time, expert review effort and total operating cost with the existing process. Test missing evidence, access changes and historical questions too.
Next step
Contact us to discuss a pilot, its source connections and commercial terms.
Which part of your product takes too long to explain?
Tell us about a recurring question and the sources your team uses. We can help define a pilot around it.